BS-19 Injections and ‘Informed Consent’

BS-19 Injections and ‘Informed Consent’

By Elizabeth Hart

Please see below emails to Martin Fletcher, CEO of the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA).
A variety of organisations are now announcing they will mandate covid-19 ‘vaccination’, e.g. Golf Australia is supporting the Royal Melbourne Golf Club’s stipulation that golf players have covid-19 injections, as raised in my email to Martin Fletcher below.
This pressure to have covid injections is looming in all facets of life, we have to tackle this now.
The thread of emails below also includes my email to Mr Edgar Basto, President BHP Minerals Australia, challenging him about BHP’s move to mandate covid-19 injections for its 45,000 employees and contractors, which I have also brought to the attention of Martin Fletcher at AHPRA.
I strongly suspect most of the people who have been pressured to have the covid-19 injections so far have not freely given their properly ‘informed consent’ – how can they when there is so much coercion and misinformation to contend with?
This campaign to manipulate the health decisions of billions of people around the world is developing into a very serious scandal indeed…

Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination
policy

For the attention of:
Mr Martin Fletcher, CEO
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA)

Copied to:

  • Dr Anne Tonkin, Chair, Medical Board of Australia
  • Ms Gill Callister PSM, AHPRA Agency Management Committee
  • Dr Karen Price, President, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP
  • Professor John Wilson AM, President, Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP)
  • Dr Omar Khorshid, President, Australian Medical Association (AMA)

Mr Fletcher, please see below my email to Mr James Sutherland, CEO of Golf Australia, re Golf Australia’s stance in now supporting interference with people’s medical decisions, i.e. stipulating golf players have covid-19 injections, with the Royal Melbourne Golf Club setting this precedent.

This is an example of the myriad ways now looming to make Australians have covid-19 injections, being coerced into submitting to these medical interventions to obtain ‘vaccine passports’, without giving authentic informed consent.

People are being made prey to scandal-ridden organisations such as Pfizer with penalties of $4.6 billion, and AstraZeneca with penalties of $1.1 billion, criminal companies which have been protected from liability by the Morrison Government re the covid-19 injection rollout.

Health professionals, including GPs, nurses and pharmacists who are in the frontline pushing these medical products upon the community, have also been protected from liability by the Morrison Government.

Meanwhile, the community is being assured the covid-19 injections are ‘safe and effective’ – this is misleading in my view, with so much yet unknown about these fast-tracked medical interventions. (The Government of South Australia’s ‘Getting vaccinated’ webpage is provided as an example of the promotion of ‘safe and effective vaccines’, see copy of webpage attached, which curiously includes a list of disclaimers in the print version, which is not in view on the active webpage…).

People who suffer an adverse event after covid-19 injections will be left to bear the consequences, and to try to navigate their way through the hastily constructed COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Scheme for compensation for the disruption to their health and life.

Mr Fletcher, we have no idea what the future holds in regards to the rushed global rollout of defective covid-19 injections, which apparently do not prevent infection nor transmission, have unknown duration of ‘immunity’, and who knows what other problems lie in store with this unprecedented global experiment, against a virus it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people.

The situation is getting more serious by the day Mr Fletcher…in my opinion millions of Australians have not been properly informed about the covid-19 injections, and have not properly given their informed consent before this medical intervention.

The Morrison Government may have given the vaccine manufacturers and health professionals protection from liability, but how will this stand if authentic informed consent was not obtained before the medical intervention?

Mr Fletcher, it’s ‘on the record’ that I’ve repeatedly brought this matter to your attention, and also to the attention of Dr Anne Tonkin, Ms Gill Callister, Dr Karen Price, Professor John Wilson and Dr Omar Khorshid.

I’m appalled at your lack of action on this matter, and again question whether AHPRA’s failure to act constitutes gross negligence and dereliction of duty by AHPRA to the community, along with the RACGP, RACP and AMA.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.

 

For the attention of:
Mr James Sutherland, CEO, Golf Australia

Copied to:

  • Mr Andrew Newbold, Chairman of Golf Australia
  • Mr Barry Linke, General Manager, Grange Golf Club SA

Dear Mr Sutherland, I see that “Golf Australia is backing Royal Melbourne’s decision to only allow vaccinated
players on to the course when golf resumes in Victoria”, as reported by Martin Blake in GA backs vaccination
move, 8 September (2020).

This is a very interesting precedent Mr Sutherland, that Golf Australia is now intervening in pressing people to have medical interventions in order to participate in golf, i.e. covid-19 injections.

On what scientific and medical evidence have you made this decision to support golf clubs making conditions about players’ medical status, can you please provide references?

Are you aware that Golf Australia’s decision has serious ramifications for ‘informed consent’ before a medical intervention, i.e. covid-19 injections, as you now apparently support people of all ages and health status being pressured to submit to covid-19 injections to participate in golf.

Mr Sutherland, the recent startling moves in our liberal democracy to coerce people to have medical interventions, i.e.
covid-19 injections, are a very serious matter.

In this regard, please see below my thread of mails raising the issue of ‘informed consent’ before covid-19 injections with Mr Martin Fletcher, CEO of the Australian Health Practitioner Agency (AHPRA), and Mr Edgar Basto, President BHP Minerals Australia. I’m pursuing this further.

Mr Sutherland, I suggest you and your colleagues at Golf Australia consider this matter very carefully, before seeking
to interfere with golf players’ medical decisions.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.

 

For the attention of:
Mr Martin Fletcher, CEO
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA)

Copied to:

  • Dr Anne Tonkin, Chair, Medical Board of Australia
  • Ms Gill Callister PSM, AHPRA Agency Management Committee
  • Dr Karen Price, President, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP)
  • Professor John Wilson AM, President, Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP)
  • Dr Omar Khorshid, President, Australian Medical Association (AMA)

Mr Fletcher, all Australians are under intense pressure to submit to covid-19 injections, including many workers and contractors facing mandatory vaccination being imposed by companies/employers.

In this regard, please see below my email to Mr Edgar Basto, President BHP Minerals Australia, challenging him about BHP’s plan to coerce its 45,000 employees and contractors to have covid-19 injections. The arguments made in my email to Mr Basto are also relevant to other companies.

Coercion to vaccinate is denying Australians the right to properly consider the risks, benefits, and unknowns about covid-19 injections in their own particular circumstances, in effect denying their right to ‘informed consent’ before the medical intervention of vaccination.

It’s a very serious matter that many companies/employers are imposing their will and interfering with employees’ and contractors’ bodily autonomy, where will this end…?

Mr Fletcher, you have previously assured me that “A medical practitioner must obtain informed consent before undertaking an examination or providing treatment, including providing vaccines.” (Letter dated 5 October 2017, see copy attached.)

In my email to Mr Basto, I note I’ve raised this matter with AHPRA, as there is clearly a conflict with the Morrison and State Governments’ aggressive covid-19 injection rollout, and health practitioners’ ethical responsibility to obtain informed consent before this medical intervention.

I’ve provided Mr Basto with hyperlinks to my emails to AHPRA which remain unanswered, and I question whether AHPRA’s failure to respond constitutes gross negligence and dereliction of duty by AHPRA to the community? Members of the public such as myself are even refused a direct email address to raise these matters with AHPRA, you really have a serious problem with public accountability in AHPRA.

Mr Fletcher, it appears millions of people have now been pressured to have covid-19 injections in Australia, and I very much question whether any of these people have been properly informed, and provided authentic informed consent to this medical intervention.

I again request your response, see below my email to AHPRA dated 27 August 2021, which remains unanswered.

Please note this email and further correspondence will be shared with other parties, this is an important matter of public interest.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

 

For the attention of:
Mr Edgar Basto
President BHP Minerals Australia

Dear Mr Basto, The Australian reports that “BHP is moving to mandate [covid-19] vaccines for its 45,000 employees and contractors, as it launches vaccination hubs across the country to protect the mining sector and accelerate national vaccine targets”.

Mr Basto, is BHP going to deny its employees and contractors their right to ‘informed consent’ before vaccination, without coercion?

The Australian Immunisation Handbook notes:

“For consent to be legally valid…It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation…It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person”.

Mr Basto, on what medical basis is BHP bullying its 45,000 employees and contractors into having the covid-19 injections?

Despite all the Morrison and State Government and media driven fear-mongering, are you aware the symptoms of covid-19 are generally mild for most people, e.g. the World Health Organisation acknowledges “Most people infected with COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment”?

Are you aware the covid-19 injections:

  • apparently do not prevent infection and transmission;
  • only claim to reduce hospitalisations and deaths, which is not relevant to most people as most are not at serious risk of covid-19;
  • have unknown duration of ‘immunity’ – the Australian Government Department of Health website admits: “It is not yet known how long the protection of the COVID-19 vaccine will last. We will know more through ongoing research…”. In other words the people having these injections are guinea pigs, and it’s likely most don’t realise they are participating in a global experiment;
  • future consequences of repeated covid injections throughout life are unknown; etc.

The situation is particularly serious for young people, particularly now even children, who are being set up for a lifetime of covid injections, despite the fact they are not at risk of the disease. Many of BHP’s 45,000 employees and contractors have children, so this is an important matter for them to consider.

Mr Basto, people in the vulnerable groups have been offered these covid-19 injections – why are people outside these vulnerable groups, e.g. many of BHP’s 45,000 employees and contractors, being pressured to submit to what could be lifelong covid injections, against a disease which isn’t a serious risk for most people? Why is there apparently great reluctance to acknowledge treatments (e.g. Ivermectin) and preventatives (e.g. vitamin D) for covid-19? It’s an extraordinary situation we’re in after 18 months.

There is much that is unknown about the covid-19 injections. It’s appalling that these medical interventions are being coercively pressed upon the Australian population, including BHP’s 45,000 employees and contractors, and that Australians are being denied the right to properly consider the risks and benefits of these interventions in their personal circumstances, particularly with the threat of divisive ‘vaccine passports’ and ‘vaccination apartheid’ looming.

Mr Basto, I suspect most Australians are not being given the opportunity to properly and freely give their informed consent to covid-19 injections, i.e. without coercion.

I’ve raised this matter with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA), as there is clearly a conflict with the Morrison and State Governments’ aggressive covid-19 injection rollout, and health practitioners’ ethical responsibility to obtain informed consent before this medical intervention.

In this regard, please see below my recent email to AHPRA, pursuing accountability for this problem of the failure to properly obtain informed consent, which includes hyperlinks to my previous detailed emails on this matter. I’m questioning whether AHPRA’s failure to respond constitutes gross negligence and dereliction of duty by AHPRA to the community.

Mr Basto, I request you carefully reconsider BHP’s plan to coerce its 45,000 employees and contractors into submitting to what could be lifelong covid injections, with unknown future consequences.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.

 

For the attention of:
Regulatory Advisor, Notifications (Intake & Assessment)
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA)

Tash, re your email below, I still haven’t received a response from an ‘appropriate person’ re my emails to AHPRA re health practitioners’ ethical duty to obtain valid informed consent before vaccination. It’s extraordinary that I’m unable to obtain from AHPRA a direct email contact to properly deal with my queries. AHPRA is standing aloof from the community.

I question whether the delay in receiving a response from AHPRA on this most important matter during the Morrison and State Governments’ coercive covid-19 vaccine rollout constitutes gross negligence and dereliction of duty by AHPRA to the community?

My emails are personally addressed to Mr Martin Fletcher, CEO of AHPRA; Dr Anne Tonkin, Chair, Medical Board of  Australia; and Ms Gill Callister PSM, Chair, AHPRA Agency Management Committee, and also to the heads of other doctors’ organisations. These people were also copied on many of my other emails on related matters.

A previous response I received from Mr Fletcher in October 2017 assures me: “Good medical practice: A code of conduct for doctors in Australia provides guidance to medical practitioners. Informed consent is a key element of good medical practice. A medical practitioner must obtain informed consent before undertaking an examination or providing treatment, including providing vaccines.”

I strongly suspect that most people are not being properly informed about the ‘leaky’ covid-19 injections in regards to their own age and health status, and therefore are not giving their valid ‘informed consent’ before this medical intervention. This is a very serious matter.

For the record, here are links to the emails forwarded specifically to Mr Fletcher, Dr Tonkin and Ms Callister via: communications@ahpra.gov.au

  • Is it ethical to insist on covid-19 injections for health staff? 7 July 2021
  • Is it ethical to inject mass populations with covid injections? Questioning the ethics evaluation process for covid vaccine clinical trials 5 July 2021.
  • Is it ethical for doctors to inject children with covid-19 injections? 15 June 2021.
  • Coercive covid-19 injections in Australia – email to the Medical Board of Australia, AHPRA, RACGP, RACP, AMA 8 June 2021.

Can you please advise me what is going on and how long until I receive a response to my queries re health practitioners’ ethical duty to obtain valid informed consent before vaccination, relevant to the Morrison and State Governments’ coercive covid-19 injection rollout?

For your information, please see attached an acknowledgement email I received on 11 June 2021, advising my email
of 8 June 2021 had been forwarded as requested. I’ve only received automatic responses since then, and no specific
response to any of my emails at all.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.

Note: This email has also been forwarded to members of political parties currently occupying the Federal and
State Governments. I question the legitimacy of these people who are exerting extraordinary control over the
free movement and association of Australians on a very questionable basis, and who are refusing to be
accountable to the Australian electorate.

 

National Intake and Assessment Team wrote:

Dear Ms Hart,

Thank you for your telephone call today.

As discussed, I confirm that I will raise the issue of the failure to respond to your emails, as sent to communications@ahpra.gov.au, to the attention of an appropriate person to respond.

Kind regards
Tash
Regulatory Advisor, Notifications (Intake & Assessment)

Original Source: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/covid-19-injections-and-informed-consent.pdf

Related News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ANR Meme Report

with Nadine Roberts

Episode 002

ANR Daily News

View all news

Receive Daily News from our independent media partners