The C0V-19 Jab Rollout Is a Disaster… South Australian Jab Campaign Shows It In Plain Sight
By Elizabeth Hart
For the attention of:
Peter Malinauskas
Leader of the SA Labor Party
Premier of South Australia
Peter Malinauskas, it seems the Covid-19 jab rollout is a disaster, both in Australia and internationally, no wonder “booster rates remain sluggish despite official jab blitz”, as reported on the Murdoch tabloid The Advertiser, see article attached.
SA Health demonstrates the failure of the Covid-19 jabs in plain sight, with its current Double vaxxed isn’t fully vaxxed media campaign. See also on YouTube for a transcript of the campaign, also included at the end of this email.
In the videos for this campaign, ‘Peta’, a 34 year old woman, tells of how she ‘got Covid’ despite being young, healthy and double vaxxed. Yes, this young woman apparently came down with a serious case of Covid, resulting in hospitalisation, despite being ‘double vaxxed’, but the message is have another shot to be ‘fully vaxxed’. How long will this ‘fully vaxxed’ status last?
Another example in the campaign advertisement is 24 year old ‘Henry’, a young, healthy ‘double vaxxed’ person reportedly suffering badly with Covid…so much for the Covid jabs then. Again the message is ‘double vaxxed isn’t fully vaxxed’.
Really Peter Malinauskas, are you gaslighting South Australians with this marketing campaign aggressively pushing defective Covid jabs?
The Covid-19 jabs campaign is a mess! ‘Mark’, the intensive care doctor featured in the Covid jab campaign, says “a third shot is your best shot at not catching Covid, spreading Covid, or ending up in hospital”. Where is the evidence to support this statement for this jab marketing campaign?
The fact is Peter Malinauskas, this is a massive experiment, being undertaken without valid voluntary consent…in many cases these experimental jabs are being mandated! Do you have any ethics advisers on this matter Peter Malinauskas? Do they support experimental Covid jabs being mandated? I’ve repeatedly raised this matter with doctors’ organisations, but they refuse to respond, see for example my mail to Karen Price, president of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners: Covid-19 jab mandates overriding ‘valid voluntary consent’, 28 February 2022.
On the subject of infection and transmission and ‘herd immunity in the population’, in January 2021, Allen Cheng, then co-chair of ATAGI, admitted “it was not yet possible to say whether the administration of any vaccine would result in herd immunity in the population, because it was not known how effectively any of the COVID19 vaccines would stop transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus”, as reported on The Australian, see copy of article attached. Allen Cheng said: “I don’t think it’s clear for any vaccine really. For the Pfizer vaccine, they actually didn’t study it at all in the clinical trials. So we don’t actually know at all whether it results in immunity that will prevent transmission. They are planning to look at it, but that data isn’t available.”
And on this basis, the mass population Covid jab rollout was initiated in Australia… Mind-boggling!!!
As for the data, it seems this is being collected via post-market assessment, i.e. people being jabbed in the community are now part of the clinical trials assessing these vaccine products, as I raised with Brendan Murphy, Secretary of the Australian Department of Health, in my email COVID-19 vaccines are NOT fully approved by the TGA, 24 February 2021. Former Federal health minister, Greg Hunt, has admitted “The world is engaged in the largest clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever…” in an interview with David Speers on ABC Insiders, February 2021.
Now everyone in Australia, five-years and older, is being pressed to have repeated defective Covid jabs in this experiment without valid voluntary consent, with no data on potential long-term harms.
Why is this happening? In January 2021, Allen Cheng said “We’re going for protection to start with; we want to stop people getting sick and dying”. But who was ever at risk of “getting sick and dying”? The World Health Organization acknowledges “Most people infected with the virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment”.
The World Health Organization says: “…some will become seriously ill and require medical attention. Older people and those with underlying medical conditions like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease or cancer are more likely to develop serious illness” - so why weren’t efforts focussed to protect and treat these vulnerable groups, instead of foisting experimental Covid jabs on almost the entire population, against a disease it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious risk for most people?
Are young people now at increased risk of serious illness and hospitalisation after being jabbed with the Covid-19 ‘leaky vaccines’? Seems like it, going by the SA Health ‘Double vaxxed isn’t fully vaxxed’ media campaign, with poor young ‘Peta’ and ‘Henry’ not doing too well after being double jabbed.
Peter Malinauskas, the unnatural Covid jab rollout is causing havoc… I remind you of my BMJ rapid response, published in March 2020: Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The case of SARS-CoV2. I first brought my BMJ response to your attention in March 2020, and again in my email to you dated 25 May 2022, see Questioning the evidence base for ‘free’ Covid and flu jabs…what about natural immunity?, also included in the thread of my email sent to you on 30 May 2022, see: ‘Free’ flu jabs…conflicts of interest…and the Immunisation Coalition/vaccine industry…
Retrospective critical analysis of the grossly disproportionate and ill-targeted global Covid-19 response is only just beginning… For instance, how did a ‘vaccine solution’, against a disease it was known from the start wasn’t a serious threat to most people, get off the ground? The UK/Boris Johnson government is central in this matter, see for instance my emails to UK government advisers Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty:
- The reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the most reckless and grossly irresponsible ‘public health’ response in history, 6 April 2021
- Reckless and grossly irresponsible response to covid-19 - the UK in the thick of it, 28 July 2021
Who else is behind the incessant demand for people to have defective Covid injections every few months? It seems the industry-funded Immunisation Coalition is calling the shots on taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, e.g. with the Immunisation Coalition’s CEO Kim Sampson insisting “You need to get that third dose, for full immunity to be achieved”. Former Immunisation Coalition chair and current board director Robert Booy joins in with a tortured argument about hybrid immunity, in an article on the Murdoch tabloid the Herald Sun. Somehow it was forgotten to disclose that the Immunisation Coalition is funded by the vaccine industry, i.e. Pfizer, moderna, Seqirus/CSL, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Biocelect and MSD (aka Merck). Seems like the vaccine industry is concerned that more than 16 million Covid jabs are reaching their use-by date, and Australians are refusing to get the third and fourth jabs. (See Aussies shun Covid booster jabs, copy attached.) This doesn’t bode well for shifting the remainder of the 280 million Covid jabs secured by the Morrison Government on the advice of the Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group.
The Herald Sun article also fails to disclose that the Murdoch media/News Corp Australia is a corporate partner with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, which is involved in vaccine research, including Covid-19 vaccine research with the Doherty Institute, as discussed in my emails:
- Scott Morrison “a hypocrite and a liar” - informed consent and the Covid-19 jab rollout, 10 February 2022
- No Jab, No Pay/No Play - coercive coronavirus vaccination in Australia - PM Scott Morrison and the Murdoch Media, 18 February 2021
The defective Covid-19 jab rollout is a conflicted shambles. How many South Australians have been mandated to submit to the obviously defective Covid injections, at the behest of Nicola Spurrier and Grant
Stevens via the Marshall and Malinauskas SA governments, plus employers and any other organisation that decided to interfere in people’s personal healthcare decisions and mandate the defective Covid jabs?
Peter Malinauskas, you’ve got a massive ethical, and potentially legal, catastrophe on your hands.
